Small intestine colonisation

Doing low-FODMAP right

The best-studied diet for bloating, and why it is only meant to be temporary.

How solid is the research? Trust score 4 of 5:Well supported

The low-FODMAP diet helps with IBS in the short term in several randomised trials and is recommended in guidelines as a time-limited trial. However, the guideline rates the quality of the evidence as very low, because the studies are small and hard to blind. The long-term effects of strict restriction on the microbiome are less well studied.

Healthy state

FODMAP Short for fermentable sugars and sugar alcohols that are poorly absorbed in the small intestine, such as fructans, lactose, fructose and sorbitol. stands for fermentable oligo-, di- and monosaccharides and Sugar alcohols (polyols) Sweeteners such as sorbitol, xylitol or maltitol, which also occur in fruit. They are barely absorbed and can cause bloating and diarrhoea. More in the chapter “Lactose, fructose, gluten: making sense of intolerances”. It covers four groups of short carbohydrates that are poorly absorbed in the small intestine: fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides (in wheat, rye, onions, garlic, legumes), lactose (milk sugar), fructose in excess (honey, apples, mango) and polyols or sugar alcohols such as sorbitol and mannitol (stone fruit, mushrooms, cauliflower, sugar-free chewing gum). Humans have no digestive enzymes at all for fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides; for lactose many adults lack part of the lactase, and fructose uptake has a limited transport capacity that is used up when fructose is in excess of glucose.

Because these substances stay in the small intestine, two things happen. They act osmotically, meaning they draw water into the gut until concentrations balance. And they travel on into the colon, where bacteria ferment them: into gases (hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and in some people, with the help of archaea, methane) and Short-chain fatty acids Acids such as acetate, propionate and butyrate that gut bacteria make from fibre. They nourish the gut wall and act throughout the body. More in the chapter “Butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids”. That is normal and intended, because these very substances are food for useful bacteria such as bifidobacteria. A person without symptoms produces considerable amounts of gas every day and hardly notices, because it passes or is absorbed.

What matters is that effects add up. A small portion of onion rarely causes problems, but onion, apple, milk and a sugar-free chewing gum on the same day can together cross the threshold. How much someone tolerates depends on amount, sum, gut sensitivity, stress level and daily form. The same food can be fine one day and not the next.

FODMAPsColonsome gas is normal and not felt
FODMAPs are quickly fermentable sugars. It is normal for bacteria to make some gas from them.

Disrupted state: causes and effects

With a sensitive gut, the same amount of gas and water triggers symptoms. In Irritable bowel syndrome Recurring abdominal pain linked to bowel movements, without tests finding another cause. Today it is understood as a disorder of gut–brain interaction. More in the chapter “The gut-brain axis” it is often not the amount of gas that is higher but the perception: the pain fibres of the gut wall (“visceral hypersensitivity”) react to a stretch others do not feel, and gut movement reacts faster. With bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine, fermentation also happens earlier, in a gut section poorly built for it, and the gas arrives there sooner and stronger. More on the causes is in the chapters on bloating and Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) Too many bacteria in the small intestine, where normally few live. Bloating and diarrhoea are typical; it is usually diagnosed with a breath test. More in the chapter “When the small intestine is too densely colonised”.

What the studies show: in a crossover study of 30 people with irritable bowel syndrome, a low-FODMAP diet over 21 days clearly improved symptoms compared with usual food, above all bloating, pain and wind; healthy controls noticed little. In a later study of 104 people with a sham diet, symptom scores also fell, but the share with adequate relief did not differ clearly in the overall analysis (57 versus 38 percent). That a large share also improved on the sham diet shows how big the expectation effect is. A systematic review concludes that the diet helps in the short term, but the guideline rates the evidence as very low quality because diets can hardly be blinded. Roughly half to two thirds of people respond.

The downsides: in the same study the number of bifidobacteria fell on the diet, the very bacteria that live on FODMAPs. If you avoid strictly in the long run, you also forgo many fibres, calcium from milk and variety, risk constipation and often eat in a one-sided way. In people with eating disorders or fear of food, the diet can reinforce fear of foods (see the chapter on fear of eating and underweight). Children, pregnant women, older people and people who are underweight also need support. That is why the diet is meant as a test, not a way of life.

Typical misunderstandings: low-FODMAP is not gluten-free, even though wheat is affected; with wheat it is mostly the fructans, not the gluten, that cause symptoms. And eating gluten-free before Coeliac disease An autoimmune disease in which gluten damages the lining of the small intestine. It is diagnosed with a blood test and usually a biopsy while you are still eating gluten. More in the chapter “Lactose, fructose, gluten: making sense of intolerances” is ruled out distorts the test. Low-FODMAP is also not “sugar-free” or “low-carb” but a targeted selection. It does not replace a diagnosis: if you have warning signs such as blood in the stool, unintended weight loss, night-time diarrhoea or iron deficiency, you need work-up first. Intolerances such as lactose and fructose can partly be tested individually, see the chapter on intolerances.

FODMAPsColonsensitive gut: stretching hurts
In a sensitive gut the same amount of gas stretches noticeably and hurts.

What often helps

Lifestyle

Diet, exercise, sleep, social contact and dealing with stress.

  • Phase 1: leave out for 2 to 6 weeks Consistently reduce high-FODMAP foods and observe whether the symptoms ease. If there is no improvement after four to six weeks, end the diet and do not extend it; it probably will not help. A symptom diary before and during the diet makes the effect visible. Well supported How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Phase 2: reintroduce one by one Test one group after another to find your personal triggers. Each group over a few days in rising amounts with breaks in between, so that you can link reaction and cause. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [2]
  • Phase 3: eat as varied as possible Only avoid what really causes symptoms. Put everything else back on your plate. Many tolerate smaller amounts of a trigger; the limit is often a question of portion. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Watch amounts and the sum Effects add up: better small portions spread over the day than several triggers in one meal. Sugar alcohols in “sugar-free” products count too. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Start with the simple levers Before eliminating strictly, regular meals, slow eating, less coffee and alcohol, fluid intake and exercise often help already. That is a gentle first step, especially if you tend towards fear of food. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Rebuild fibre gently after the diet After the test phase, rebuild variety on purpose, step by step, so the gut microbiota can recover. The chapter on prebiotics in small steps explains how. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [3]

Natural supplements

Supplements do not replace a medical check-up. Discuss dosage and interactions with your doctor or pharmacist.

  • Lactase tablets Help people with confirmed lactose intolerance to tolerate dairy products better. Well supported How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Probiotics as an accompaniment In the study, bifidobacteria fell on the diet and a probiotic restored them but did not improve symptoms further. A benefit for symptoms is therefore not proven; it is an approach to support the gut microbiota during the restriction. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [3]

Medical treatments

Information, not a treatment recommendation. Decide together with a doctor. Approval and availability differ from country to country.

  • With a dietitian The diet works best and most safely with support. It is not suitable for people with a history of eating disorders. Well supported How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Rule out coeliac disease and warning signs first In irritable bowel with diarrhoea, a coeliac test is part of the work-up as long as you still eat gluten. Warning signs such as blood in the stool, weight loss, fever or night-time symptoms also need to be checked first. Well supported How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Use breath tests only selectively Hydrogen breath tests can show lactose or fructose malabsorption. They are not necessary for everyone, and their benefit is limited. Ask whether it makes sense for you before you cut whole food groups. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

In the mood for something completely different? Another one, at random

How we rate the evidence
Trust score 5 of 5:Established
Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies.
Trust score 4 of 5:Well supported
Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results.
Trust score 3 of 5:Promising
Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies.
Trust score 2 of 5:Plausible
Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms.
Trust score 1 of 5:Experimental
Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Sources

  1. Lacy et al. 2021: ACG clinical guideline on irritable bowel syndrome (American Journal of Gastroenterology)
  2. Halmos et al. 2014: Low-FODMAP diet reduces irritable bowel symptoms, crossover trial with 30 patients (Gastroenterology)
  3. Staudacher et al. 2017: Low-FODMAP diet reduces irritable bowel symptoms and bifidobacteria, a probiotic restores them, 104 people (Gastroenterology)
  4. Systematic review 2024: low-FODMAP diet in IBS (Food & Function)
  5. Storey et al. 2007: Tolerance of erythritol and xylitol, randomised and double-blind (European Journal of Clinical Nutrition)

Your progress

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.

Ratings by readers

No averages yet. They appear once 3 readers have answered a question.

Helpful for me 0 = not at all · 5 = very
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Had new information for me 0 = nothing new · 5 = a lot that was new
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Easy to understand 0 = very hard · 5 = very easy
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Matches my understanding 0 = contradicts it completely · 5 = matches it completely
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Correct and up to date 0 = wrong or outdated · 5 = correct and up to date
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet

Log in to rate this chapter. An account is optional and free.

Is something wrong here?

If you think something is wrong, outdated or misleading, report it for review. Every report is read and answered.

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.