Microbial diversity

Sweeteners and sugar alcohols

Sugar-free does not mean without consequences: what each sweetener and sugar alcohol does to the gut microbiota and digestion.

How solid is the research? Trust score 2 of 5:Plausible

That sugar alcohols have a laxative effect and cause bloating in larger amounts is well established. That sweeteners change the gut microbiota has so far been shown by one well-designed but short study. What this means for long-term health is unknown.

Cause or consequence? Root cause 4 of 5:Often a cause

Sweeteners can change the gut flora, differently in each person, and sugar alcohols often trigger bloating and diarrhoea. They act as a trigger from outside rather than a consequence of other gut problems, but are rarely the sole cause.

Healthy state

Sweeteners taste far sweeter than sugar and provide almost no calories. Sugar alcohols (polyols) Sweeteners such as sorbitol, xylitol or maltitol, which also occur in fruit. They are barely absorbed and can cause bloating and diarrhoea. More in the chapter “Lactose, fructose, gluten: making sense of intolerances” are a second group: less sweet, also almost calorie-free, and only partly absorbed. The ingredients list gives the name, in the European Union and many other countries also an E number. What they do to the bacteria in the gut is a second, often overlooked question: not every substance is fully absorbed, and part of it reaches the large intestine and meets the Microbiome, gut microbiota The community of all microbes in the gut, mainly bacteria, plus viruses, fungi and archaea. Most live in the colon. More in the chapter “Building microbial diversity” there.

Sucralose (E955) is made from sugar and is around 600 times sweeter. The body absorbs very little of it, and much of it leaves the gut unchanged. For the microbiome, sucralose is the best-studied sweetener: around 85 percent of it reach the large intestine. Reviews of Randomised trial A study in which chance decides who gets the treatment and who does not, for comparison. This makes results particularly reliable. in humans find no clear average change in diversity or blood sugar; individual studies and many animal experiments do show shifted bacterial communities and a weakened gut lining. In a test tube, a sucralose-containing sweetener promoted Biofilm A community of microbes that sticks to a surface and embeds itself in a self-made protective coat, such as dental plaque. More in the chapter “Biofilms in the gut and “biofilm busters”” formation and the exchange of resistance genes in some gut bacteria. It is found in zero and light drinks, protein powders and bars, sugar-free chewing gum and table-top sweeteners.

Saccharin (E954) is the oldest sweetener and about 300 times sweeter than sugar. On the ingredients list it usually appears as the salt sodium saccharin. Some of it is absorbed and excreted through the kidneys, some reaches the large intestine. For the microbiome, saccharin carries the oldest finding: in a much-cited 2014 study it changed the gut flora in mice and humans and worsened blood sugar control, and the effect could be passed on to germ-free mice by stool transfer. How well this translates to everyday life is still disputed. It is found in sweetener tablets, light and zero lemonades, sugar-free sweets and, in some countries, in toothpaste.

Aspartame (E951) is around 200 times sweeter and is broken down into its building blocks already in the digestive tract; hardly any of it reaches the large intestine intact. Because so little of it arrives in the large intestine, it was long considered harmless to the gut flora; in the large Cell study of 2022 it still changed the microbiome, and solid microbiome studies in humans are lacking. It is found in light and zero lemonades, chewing gum, light yoghurt and table-top sweeteners. People with the metabolic disorder phenylketonuria have to avoid it, which is why there is a note on the packaging.

Steviol glycosides from the stevia plant (E960) are around 200 to 300 times sweeter. They pass through the small intestine largely unchanged, and only in the large intestine do bacteria split them into steviol. There they inhibit individual bacterial species and change the microbiome only cautiously in experiments. One finding concerns viruses: stevia and its main component rebaudioside A woke dormant Bacteriophages Viruses that only infect bacteria. In the gut there are probably about as many phages as bacteria, perhaps more, and they help determine which bacteria prevail. More in the chapter “Bacteriophages: the hunters in the gut” inside gut bacteria – viruses that attack bacteria – and thereby changed which microbes can multiply; rebaudioside A also bound directly to phage proteins and changed their infectivity. What this means for humans is open. They are found in table-top sweeteners, drinks, dairy products and sweets advertised with “stevia”; the dried leaves are used to sweeten tea.

Acesulfame K (E950) is named after the fact that it occurs as a potassium salt — the K stands for potassium. Most of it is absorbed and excreted unchanged through the kidneys; but part of it does reach the large intestine. There, bacteria can break it down: in a gut model with children’s microbiota this produced more Butyrate A short-chain fatty acid and the main energy source for the cells of the colon wall. It strengthens the barrier and dampens inflammation. More in the chapter “Butyrate and other short-chain fatty acids”, while breakdown products were linked to a more permeable gut lining. A small study in young adults found shifted bacterial proportions after diet soda with acesulfame K and sucralose. It is found in table-top sweeteners, light and zero lemonades, soft drinks and sugar-free chewing gum.

Cyclamate (E952) appears on the ingredients list usually as the salt sodium cyclamate. It is about 30 to 50 times sweeter than sugar, and so clearly weaker than the other sweeteners. Gut bacteria can form cyclohexylamine from cyclamate, and it is not permitted in every country. Studies on what cyclamate does to the microbiome or to bacteriophages are still largely lacking. It is found in light and zero lemonades and in table-top sweeteners.

Acesulfame K and cyclamate rarely appear alone on an ingredients list. Almost always they come as a mixture with aspartame or saccharin, because the combination tastes rounder and each single substance can then be dosed lower. The newer neotame (E961) fills the same role. What such mixtures do in the gut has hardly been studied; most studies examine single substances, while labels often list several together.

Sugar alcohols such as sorbitol (E420), mannitol (E421), isomalt (E953), maltitol (E965), lactitol (E966), xylitol (E967) and erythritol (E968) are absorbed slowly and only in part. The rest draws water into the gut and is fermented by bacteria. Erythritol is the exception: most of it is absorbed and excreted unchanged, so it usually causes no symptoms. Sorbitol and maltitol are FODMAP Short for fermentable sugars and sugar alcohols that are poorly absorbed in the small intestine, such as fructans, lactose, fructose and sorbitol. More in the chapter “Doing low-FODMAP right”. In the large intestine they are food for the bacteria: erythritol scored well in a gut model and promoted butyrate production, while sorbitol promoted inflammatory signals in a mouse study. In practice the amount matters most – the more arrives undigested, the more gas and bloating. Sugar alcohols are found in sugar-free chewing gum, sweets and cough drops, protein bars, sugar-free chocolate, “keto” and “zero” products and some toothpastes.

Small intestineColonSweetenerSugar alcoholpartly absorbedsmall amounts: bacteria cope
Sweeteners and sugar alcohols are only partly absorbed in the small intestine. The rest reaches the bacteria.

Disrupted state: causes and effects

In a randomised trial with 120 people, all four sweeteners studied changed the gut microbiota within two weeks, differently from person to person. Saccharin and sucralose also made blood sugar rise slightly more after a sugar drink. Whether this harms health is open: the study looked at healthy adults over two weeks.

When the researchers transferred the participants' gut microbiota to germ-free mice, these mice also showed the altered blood sugar values. This suggests that the gut microbiota mediates the effect.

Sugar alcohols draw water into the gut and are fermented by bacteria. Larger amounts lead to bloating and diarrhoea. Xylitol causes considerably more symptoms than erythritol.

Sugar-free is not automatically gut-friendly, and “naturally sweetened” is no opposite of it: honey, agave syrup, coconut blossom sugar, maple syrup and fruit juice concentrate are, for the gut, essentially sugar made of glucose and fructose — with just as many calories as household sugar.

In its 2023 guideline, the World Health Organization advises against using sweeteners for weight control. The reason is analyses that found no long-term benefit and, in observational studies, a slightly higher risk of type 2 diabetes; the recommendation is graded conditional, so the evidence is limited. The guideline does not question the safety of the permitted maximum amounts.

Small intestineColonSweetenerSugar alcoholpartly absorbedthe flora can shiftwater and gas: diarrhoea, bloating
Larger amounts draw water into the gut and sugar alcohols are fermented. Some sweeteners shift the flora.

Where it comes from and where it leads

The same symptoms can have different roots. This map shows what may be involved in this problem and what may follow from it.

Possible causes. . Possible consequences. Bloating, Food fear, Nutrient deficiency

  • Possible causes
  • This problem
  • Possible consequences

The preview fits the screen width. In the large map you see everything at once.

Move the mouse over a box: its connections are highlighted and everything else steps back.

Tap a box to highlight its connections. Tap it again to open the chapter.

Connections, not certainty: a link means “can”, not “must”. What applies to you is best clarified in a talk with your doctor.

What often helps

Lifestyle

Diet, exercise, sleep, social contact and dealing with stress.

  • Read the ingredients on “sugar-free” products Sugar-free chewing gum, sweets and protein bars often contain sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, maltitol or xylitol, while soft drinks and table-top sweeteners contain sucralose, aspartame, saccharin or stevia. If you are bloated, it is worth checking the ingredients list — the name and E number are there. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Erythritol is better tolerated In a blinded study, up to 35 g of erythritol at once caused hardly any symptoms, whereas xylitol did. Erythritol is also mostly absorbed and excreted unchanged. One open question concerns high single doses: in small studies, 30 g increased the tendency of blood platelets to clump together. Whether this creates a health risk is not settled. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Sugar alcohols act by dose Symptoms depend heavily on the amount: a single piece of chewing gum is usually harmless, while a whole bag of “sugar-free” sweets or a protein bar can cause diarrhoea and bloating. Of any single sugar alcohol, better to take only a small portion a day. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • Reduce sweetness overall Water, unsweetened tea and coffee instead of diet drinks. Your taste adjusts within a few weeks. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [2]

Natural supplements

Supplements do not replace a medical check-up. Discuss dosage and interactions with your doctor or pharmacist.

  • No targeted supplements There is no supplement that offsets the effect of sweeteners on the gut microbiota. Experimental How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Medical treatments

Information, not a treatment recommendation. Decide together with a doctor. Approval and availability differ from country to country.

  • Decide individually with diabetes For people with diabetes, sweeteners instead of sugar can be useful. Discuss how to handle them with your care team. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [2]

In the mood for something completely different? Another one, at random

How we rate the evidence
Trust score 5 of 5:Established
Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies.
Trust score 4 of 5:Well supported
Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results.
Trust score 3 of 5:Promising
Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies.
Trust score 2 of 5:Plausible
Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms.
Trust score 1 of 5:Experimental
Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Sources

  1. Storey et al. 2007: Tolerance of erythritol and xylitol, randomised and double-blind (European Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
  2. Suez et al. 2022: Sweeteners alter the microbiome and blood sugar, randomised trial with 120 people (Cell)
  3. WHO guideline 2023: non-sugar sweeteners not for weight control (World Health Organization)
  4. Suez et al. 2014: sweeteners cause glucose intolerance through the gut microbiome (Nature)
  5. Review 2026: sucralose and the gut microbiota in randomised trials in humans (International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  6. Laboratory study 2026: a sucralose-containing sweetener promotes biofilms and the exchange of resistance genes in gut bacteria (Archives of Microbiology)
  7. Study 2024: diet soda with sucralose and acesulfame K shifts bacterial species in the gut of young adults (Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism)
  8. Study 2026: gut bacteria break down acesulfame K, in a gut model with children’s microbiota (Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry)
  9. Study 2020: stevia and other additives wake dormant bacteriophages inside gut bacteria (Gut Microbes)
  10. Study 2025: rebaudioside A from stevia changes the infectivity of bacteriophages (Scientific Reports)
  11. Study 2025: erythritol and allulose promote butyrate production in a gut model (Beneficial Microbes)
  12. Mouse study 2025: sugar alcohols may promote inflammation through the gut microbiome (iScience)

Your progress

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.

Ratings by readers

No averages yet. They appear once 3 readers have answered a question.

Helpful for me 0 = not at all · 5 = very
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Had new information for me 0 = nothing new · 5 = a lot that was new
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Easy to understand 0 = very hard · 5 = very easy
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Matches my understanding 0 = contradicts it completely · 5 = matches it completely
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Correct and up to date 0 = wrong or outdated · 5 = correct and up to date
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet

Log in to rate this chapter. An account is optional and free.

Is something wrong here?

If you think something is wrong, outdated or misleading, report it for review. Every report is read and answered.

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.