Microbial diversity

Gut tests: what they show and what they do not

Microbiome analysis, zonulin, IgG, breath test, calprotectin: which tests are worth it.

How solid is the research? Trust score 4 of 5:Well supported

There are guidelines for calprotectin, coeliac antibodies and elastase. That commercial microbiome, zonulin and IgG tests are unreliable is well documented by several independent studies and medical societies.

Healthy state

A test is only as good as the question it is meant to answer. Two terms help you place it. Sensitivity says how many sick people the test finds; specificity, how many healthy people it correctly recognises as healthy. Added to this is pre-test probability: a test in someone with fitting symptoms says far more than the same test in someone without symptoms. That is why good gut tests are usually targeted rather than broad.

Faecal Calprotectin A protein from white blood cells measured in stool. Raised levels point to inflammation in the gut. is a protein from immune cells and shows inflammation of the gut lining. It helps distinguish Irritable bowel syndrome Recurring abdominal pain linked to bowel movements, without tests finding another cause. Today it is understood as a disorder of gut–brain interaction. More in the chapter “The gut-brain axis” from Inflammatory bowel disease Umbrella term for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: long-term, relapsing inflammation of the gut that needs medical treatment. More in the chapter “Immune system and inflammation”. A large review found that in adults, with a cut-off of 50 µg/g, sensitivity was about 93% and specificity about 94% for this distinction. A normal value makes chronic inflammation very unlikely. But it also rises with infections, with NSAID painkillers, and with polyps or tumours, so it is not a cancer test.

Coeliac disease An autoimmune disease in which gluten damages the lining of the small intestine. It is diagnosed with a blood test and usually a biopsy while you are still eating gluten. More in the chapter “Lactose, fructose, gluten: making sense of intolerances” antibodies (against tissue transglutaminase, together with total IgA (secretory IgA) The antibody of the mucous membranes. It is released into the gut in large amounts, where it holds germs in the mucus without causing inflammation. More in the chapter “IgA: the antibody that keeps the gut clean, and what vitamin A, D and omega-3 have to do with it”) in the blood point to coeliac disease and, according to the guideline, belong in the work-up of IBS symptoms. They only work while you eat gluten. Faecal elastase shows whether the pancreas makes enough digestive enzymes; with very watery stool the value is measured too low because of dilution.

Other established examinations: stool tests for specific pathogens (culture or PCR), which show an infection or parasites when there is a suspicion; tests for Helicobacter pylori, a stomach bacterium, by breath or stool test (no acid blockers or antibiotics for some weeks beforehand, otherwise it is falsely negative); tests for hidden blood in the stool for colorectal cancer screening; and endoscopy (gastroscopy or colonoscopy), which shows the lining directly and allows tissue samples.

Breath test After drinking a sugar solution, hydrogen and methane in the breath are measured several times. This can reveal sugar intolerances and signs of bacterial overgrowth. measure gases that bacteria produce after you drink a test sugar solution. They are used for lactose, fructose and the question of Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) Too many bacteria in the small intestine, where normally few live. Bloating and diarrhoea are typical; it is usually diagnosed with a breath test. More in the chapter “When the small intestine is too densely colonised”. They are practical and harmless, but how informative they are depends strongly on preparation, test sugar and interpretation, see below.

Stool sampleLabclear answere.g. pathogens, calprotectin, elastase
A test is useful when it answers a clear question, such as a pathogen or an inflammation marker.

Disrupted state: causes and effects

Commercial Microbiome, gut microbiota The community of all microbes in the gut, mainly bacteria, plus viruses, fungi and archaea. Most live in the colon. More in the chapter “Building microbial diversity” analyses promise to show you exactly what is going on in your gut. Researchers sent the same stool sample to seven providers: the results differed greatly, even for repeat tests from the same provider. One provider rated one of three identical samples as “unhealthy” and the other two as “healthy”. Reasons are differences in sample handling, DNA analysis and data evaluation.

The basic problem: it has not yet been defined what a healthy microbiome looks like. Without this benchmark, a single result can hardly be assessed. In addition, a stool sample mainly reflects the large intestine at the end of the digestive tract. It says little about the small intestine, the Mucus layer A gel layer of mucins on the gut wall that keeps bacteria at a distance. In the colon, the inner layer is almost free of microbes. More in the chapter “The mucus layer and additives” or the folds of the lining. Condition on the day, the last few days’ diet, laxatives and antibiotics also change the result.

The zonulin test for “leaky gut” and IgG tests for foods are not suitable for a diagnosis. When many commercial tests were checked, zonulin in the blood was not reliably measured as what it promises. IgG antibodies against foods mainly show that you have eaten something. The DAO (diamine oxidase) An enzyme in the gut wall that breaks down histamine from food before it reaches the blood. More in the chapter “DAO: the enzyme that intercepts histamine from food” blood test for Histamine A messenger substance of the body that is also found in aged and fermented foods. Too much can cause headache, flushing or diarrhoea. More in the chapter “Histamine intolerance: much searched, little proven” intolerance is also unsuitable as sole proof: the values overlap strongly with those of healthy people. Expensive results then lead to expensive diets and supplements.

Established tests have limits too. A breath test can be falsely negative if the bacteria produce not hydrogen but methane or hydrogen sulphide; a three-gas test captures this better. It can be falsely positive if the test solution passes quickly through the small intestine and is already fermented in the large intestine. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth is also hard to prove reliably; guidelines stress that values must be interpreted cautiously.

Also: a “normal” result reassures but does not rule out symptoms. In IBS most tests are unremarkable, because the disorder lies in sensitivity and movement of nerves and muscles, not in visible inflammation. On the other side, “abnormal” single values without symptoms often lead to unnecessary treatment.

Warning signs call for work-up without a detour via home tests: blood in the stool, unintended weight loss, night-time diarrhoea, persistent fever, anaemia, difficulty swallowing, and symptoms that are new after age 50 or occur with a family history of bowel cancer or inflammation.

Stool sample3 providers, 3 resultsmicrobiome profiles: few reference values, fluctuating
The same sample can give three different microbiome profiles at three providers.

What often helps

Lifestyle

Diet, exercise, sleep, social contact and dealing with stress.

  • A symptom diary instead of a home test For two to four weeks, note down: food, bowel movements, symptoms, stress, sleep. This often shows more than a lab test and helps when talking to your doctor. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Prepare a breath test carefully Before a breath test there are usually rules: a simple, low-fibre diet the day before, come fasting, no smoking, no laxatives and often some weeks without antibiotics. Ask the practice for the exact instructions, otherwise the preparation distorts the result. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1]
  • See results over time A single measurement is a snapshot. In stool tests values vary from day to day. What matters more is whether symptoms, findings and course fit together, not one number alone. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Natural supplements

Supplements do not replace a medical check-up. Discuss dosage and interactions with your doctor or pharmacist.

  • No supplements based on microbiome tests Recommendations derived from commercial microbiome analyses are based on unreliable measurements. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [2][3]
  • Discuss probiotics and the like before testing Some products, such as probiotics, change stool and breath tests. Before a test, ask whether you should pause them for a few days, but never stop prescribed medicines on your own. Plausible How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Medical treatments

Information, not a treatment recommendation. Decide together with a doctor. Approval and availability differ from country to country.

  • Tests with a clear question Calprotectin if inflammation is suspected, coeliac antibodies for IBS symptoms, elastase for greasy stools. Established How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [4][5][6]
  • Take part in colorectal cancer screening This means a stool test for hidden blood or a colonoscopy. Many countries offer free screening programmes from a certain age, often 45 or 50. Ask what applies in your country. Established How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.
  • Stay away from zonulin and IgG tests They do not measure what they promise. Well supported How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [7][8]
  • Do not self-test warning signs With blood in the stool, unexplained weight loss, night-time diarrhoea, anaemia or new symptoms at an older age, get a medical work-up directly instead of buying home tests first. Established How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [4]
  • Have breath tests interpreted by someone who knows them Whether lactulose or glucose is used, and whether hydrogen alone or also methane and hydrogen sulphide are measured, changes what the result means. Have it discussed with someone who knows the limits of the test, and check whether it fits your symptoms. Promising How we rate the evidence Established Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies. Well supported Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results. Promising Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies. Plausible Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms. Experimental Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open. [1][9]

From the community: what people report

Experiences and tips from people with the same problems that come up again and again, but for which there are no meaningful studies yet. They are explicitly not evidence.

  • “Which test?” and whether it changes anything

    Very often the question is which commercial microbiome or stool test is worth it and where to get it; discount codes and promotions are everywhere in the communities. At the same time there is recurring scepticism about whether a report changes anything in practice: it is openly discussed that many results are not action-guiding and that a repeat test gives different figures. Reference is made to poor agreement between laboratories and to the fact that there is no recognised definition of a “healthy” microbiome.

    Evidence: conflicting Reported in: r/Microbiome (Reddit community),r/GutHealth (Reddit community),r/SIBO (Reddit community)

  • Contradictory findings and “missing bacteria”

    A recurring pattern is contradictory results from different methods – for example a stool test that shows a pathogen while breath or tissue tests are negative – which regularly produces bafflement. Also widespread is that single outliers in the report, such as “no butyrate” or “no Akkermansia”, lead straight to buying matching supplements, sometimes followed by feedback that the supplement was not tolerated.

    Evidence: conflicting Reported in: r/SIBO (Reddit community),r/Microbiome (Reddit community)

  • SIBO breath test: preparation and interpretation

    In the SIBO setting the breath test is everywhere. Again and again the talk is about choosing between lactulose, glucose and the three-gas test, about preparation with diet, medication and tea, and about interpreting individual curves. Those affected often report a negative breath test despite ongoing symptoms and symptoms from the test substance itself; templates for writing it down yourself are shared, along with tips on which laboratory is considered trustworthy.

    Evidence: first hints Reported in: r/SIBO (Reddit community),r/ibs (Reddit community)

Personal reports can mislead: what helps many people may be a placebo, and what helps one may harm another. Treat them as ideas to raise with your doctor or pharmacist – not as instructions.

In the mood for something completely different? Another one, at random

How we rate the evidence
Trust score 5 of 5:Established
Recommended in medical guidelines or supported by several consistent meta-analyses of randomised human studies.
Trust score 4 of 5:Well supported
Several randomised studies in humans with largely consistent results.
Trust score 3 of 5:Promising
Single randomised or controlled studies in humans, not yet independently confirmed — or many consistent observational studies.
Trust score 2 of 5:Plausible
Two cases: first observational or pilot studies with small samples — or a settled basis that is not in dispute, such as movement, sleep or meal pauses. But not tested in humans for symptoms.
Trust score 1 of 5:Experimental
Barely studied in humans. Mainly lab and animal studies or theoretical reasoning; whether it helps is open.

Sources

  1. Review 2021: How useful are hydrogen breath tests? (Nutrients)
  2. Servetas et al. 2026: analytical performance of consumer microbiome tests, study by the University of Maryland and NIST (Communications Biology)
  3. Science News 2026: Same stool sample, different results from seven test providers
  4. Lacy et al. 2021: ACG clinical guideline on irritable bowel syndrome (American Journal of Gastroenterology)
  5. European guideline 2025 on the diagnosis and treatment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
  6. Waugh et al. 2013: Faecal calprotectin testing for differentiating inflammatory and non-inflammatory bowel diseases, systematic review (Health Technology Assessment)
  7. Ajamian et al. 2019: Serum zonulin as a barrier marker, “may not be what it seems” (PLoS One)
  8. EAACI 2008: IgG4 tests for foods are not suitable for diagnosis (Allergy)
  9. Pimentel et al. 2020: ACG clinical guideline on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (American Journal of Gastroenterology)
  10. Study 2023: Serum DAO as a test for histamine intolerance (Nutrients)
  11. Rubio-Tapia et al. 2023: ACG guideline on coeliac disease (American Journal of Gastroenterology)

Your progress

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.

Ratings by readers

No averages yet. They appear once 3 readers have answered a question.

Helpful for me 0 = not at all · 5 = very
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Had new information for me 0 = nothing new · 5 = a lot that was new
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Easy to understand 0 = very hard · 5 = very easy
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Matches my understanding 0 = contradicts it completely · 5 = matches it completely
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet
Correct and up to date 0 = wrong or outdated · 5 = correct and up to date
How others rate it: not enough ratings yet

Log in to rate this chapter. An account is optional and free.

Is something wrong here?

If you think something is wrong, outdated or misleading, report it for review. Every report is read and answered.

Log in to mark chapters as read, rate them or report them for review. An account is optional and free.